Saturday, 23 June 2007

911 was an inside job?

That 911 is very, very, likely to be an inside job is really very simple. No need for even the recent fire-fighter reports of explosions which clearly suggest this. No need for very complicated details and complicated theory either. There is (unless we are in denial or blind) the simple yet indisputable evidence.


It is not possible for the buildings to fall down at anywhere near free-fall (or the speed of something falling through the air) unless deliberately demolished. Think about it. Concrete and steel falling through concrete and steel has got to take much longer than concrete and steel falling through the air!

Those who support the official story say that the towers fell due to a 'pancake' theory but if we have even the slightest commonsense, we know that it simply defies logic (and the laws of physics) for those buildings to come down at anywhere near free-fall - unless the material is blown out of the way so as to offer no or very little resistance.

It is NOT POSSIBLE for those towers to come down at anywhere near the speed they did, if they came down by a 'normal' fall. Why do people have a problem understanding this? If something isn't possible, it is not possible! We can wish all we like it was different but it won’t change that the laws involving free-fall show that the official story is not true.

Molten Steel

On both sides of the argument it has been agreed that it was not possible for the steel to melt because of the fires at the World Trade Center, yet at the same time we could see molten steel pouring out of the side of the building!

This molten metal was not aluminium as some are saying but whether it was aluminiumn or steel is not the real point being made here, when I say that anything getting to a higher temperature than the supposed source of heat is again, impossible so again it should be obvious to anyone with a brian that something else was involved (other than planes crashing and the heat of the fires). The existance of molten metal strongly suggests that Thermate was used... the residue of which chemical reaction has been found.

So, there should be no dispute over the fact that the official story cannot be true. Then we get those who say, "well, it happened a while ago now" as though this is an excuse to not look any further ... ignoring the fact that many thousands of people have been murdered on the basis of 911 which was used to ‘justify’ the so-called 'war on terror' by using the terror of war - and if we don't open up this can of worms, more will follow - even with the possibility of a nuclear war!

What kind of logic says we can stop war and terror by causing war and terror? Then what kind of logic says that the official story about 911 can be true, when it defies logic?

How many times have antiwar people said that wars are orchestrated? Hello? Yet many refuse to join dots!

You want to stop war? If the truth about 911 was more fully known by the public it would expose the reasons why we are having these wars! What happened on 9/11/2001 was a terrible crime so shouldn't we be going back to the scene of the crime? The wasted lives of thousands of victims on 9-11 and all those many, many more through wars which have been waged on that pretext, deserve to be honoured with the truth!

If we refuse to expose the lie, we become part of the lie and the bottom line is this. Unless more people make efforts to expose what really happened on 9-11, we have little chance of stopping the war agenda which murders millions of people for money and power.